News

Ricardo Bussi denied that during the last dictatorship there was a systematic plan of forced disappearance

Ricardo Bussi, a national deputy elected by Freedom Advances, has made controversial statements regarding an eventual government led by Javier Milei. Bussi believes that an economic adjustment is necessary and that the State should use the police and armed forces to establish order during social mobilizations. He also denies the existence of a systematic plan of forced disappearance during the dictatorship and refers to it as a “war” with excesses. Bussi’s comments have sparked criticism and raised concerns about his understanding of human rights and the role of the State.

Ricardo Bussi’s Statements and Views

Economic Adjustment and State Intervention

In his recent statements, Ricardo Bussi, the national deputy elected by Freedom Advances, emphasized the need for an economic adjustment in the country. He believes that regardless of who wins the election, Argentina will have to face the reality of economic challenges and make necessary changes. Bussi argues that there is no alternative to adjustment and highlights the lack of external and internal credit as a major concern. He suggests that the State, with its control over the police and armed forces, should play a role in establishing order during social mobilizations against government policies. However, it is important to note that the involvement of the armed forces in internal security matters is prohibited by fundamental laws of the Argentine democratic state.

Denial of Systematic Forced Disappearances

Bussi’s views on the dark period of Argentina’s history, specifically the dictatorship era, have sparked controversy. Despite the findings of the justice system, which determined the existence of a systematic plan of forced disappearance, Bussi denies such claims. He argues that what occurred during that time was a “war” with inevitable excesses, rather than a deliberate repressive plan. Bussi’s perspective aligns with that of his running mate, Victoria Villarruel, who also believes that a comprehensive understanding of the issue has not been achieved. It is important to note that the trial of the boards, which resulted in convictions for crimes against humanity, used terms like “plan” and “system” to describe the atrocities committed during that period.

Controversial Views on Security and Armed Forces

Confusion between Police and Armed Forces

One of the controversial aspects of Ricardo Bussi’s statements is his confusion between the roles of the police and the armed forces. During a recent interview, Bussi mistakenly equated the two, similar to the presidential candidate of La Libertad Avanza. It is important to clarify that the police are responsible for maintaining internal security and upholding the law, while the armed forces are primarily tasked with national defense. This confusion raises concerns about Bussi’s understanding of the different roles and responsibilities of these institutions.

Advocacy for State Use of Force

Another contentious viewpoint expressed by Bussi is his advocacy for the state’s use of force to establish order during social mobilizations against government policies. Bussi believes that the state, with its monopoly on force, should intervene and ensure the well-being of the community. However, it is crucial to note that the participation of the armed forces in internal security matters is strictly prohibited by fundamental laws of the Argentine democratic state. These laws were established as a result of transversal political agreements and aim to safeguard the rights and freedoms of the citizens. It is essential to strike a balance between maintaining public order and respecting the principles of a democratic society.

Disregard for Legal Prohibitions and Historical Facts

Violation of Laws on Armed Forces’ Role in Security

Ricardo Bussi’s statements have raised concerns regarding his disregard for the legal prohibitions surrounding the involvement of the armed forces in internal security matters. Despite clear laws in place, Bussi advocates for the use of the armed forces to establish order during social mobilizations. It is important to emphasize that these laws were established through political agreements to ensure the protection of citizens’ rights and maintain a democratic society. Bussi’s stance raises questions about his commitment to upholding the rule of law and respecting the boundaries set by the legal framework.

Dismissing Historical Evidence of Repression

Another troubling aspect of Bussi’s statements is his dismissal of historical evidence regarding the repression that occurred during Argentina’s dark period. Despite the findings of the justice system, which have established the existence of a systematic plan of forced disappearance, Bussi denies these claims. He characterizes the events of that time as a “war” with inevitable excesses, rather than acknowledging the deliberate repression and human rights violations that took place. It is crucial to recognize and confront the historical facts in order to promote truth, justice, and reconciliation. Dismissing or distorting these facts undermines the process of healing and accountability for past atrocities.

Controversial Actions and Comments

Confusion of Javier Milei with Adolf Hitler

Ricardo Bussi sparked controversy when he made a comment that confused Javier Milei, a political figure, with Adolf Hitler. Bussi claimed that leaflets promoting fear were distributed, suggesting that if Milei were to win, social plans would be cut and there would be no benefits. Bussi filed a criminal complaint against the organization responsible for these leaflets. However, drawing comparisons between political opponents and historical figures known for their atrocities can be highly inflammatory and disrespectful. It is important to engage in respectful and constructive political discourse that focuses on the issues at hand rather than resorting to personal attacks or inappropriate comparisons.

Criminal Complaint against Anses de Concepción

In another controversial move, Ricardo Bussi filed a criminal complaint against Anses de Concepción, an organization responsible for distributing leaflets that allegedly promoted fear. Bussi took issue with the content of these leaflets, which he believed spread misinformation about the potential consequences of Milei’s victory. While it is important to address any concerns regarding the dissemination of false information, it is equally crucial to ensure that freedom of expression and political discourse are protected. Balancing the need for accountability with the preservation of democratic values is essential in fostering a healthy and inclusive political environment.

In conclusion, Ricardo Bussi, a national deputy elected by Freedom Advances, has expressed his belief that an adjustment must be made in the economy under a potential government led by Javier Milei. He also stated that the State has the Police and the Armed Forces to establish order in the face of social mobilizations against State policies. Bussi denied the existence of a systematic plan of forced disappearance during the last dictatorship, referring to it as a “war” with excesses. However, it is important to note that the participation of the Armed Forces in security matters is prohibited by fundamental laws of the Argentine democratic state. Bussi’s comments have generated controversy and repudiation, including his confusion of Milei with Adolf Hitler. Despite the differing opinions and controversies, it is clear that the economic situation in Argentina requires adjustment and that maintaining order is crucial.

However, it is essential to remember the importance of upholding human rights and the rule of law, as established by the justice system. The past atrocities committed during the dictatorship cannot be dismissed or downplayed. Moving forward, it is crucial for political leaders to prioritize economic stability while also ensuring the protection of human rights and the well-being of the community.

These discussions and debates highlight the complexities and challenges faced by Argentina as it navigates its economic and political landscape. It is a reminder that finding the right balance between economic policies and social justice is a continuous struggle. As the country moves forward, it is imperative to learn from the past and work towards a future that prioritizes both economic growth and the protection of human rights.

Related Articles

Back to top button