The free carrying of weapons is crazy

Latin America, with only 9% of the world’s population, accounts for a staggering 35% of global homicides. In Argentina, insecurity has become a pressing social issue, despite having relatively low homicide rates compared to other Latin American countries. However, the country’s robbery rate is alarmingly high. In response to this, some individuals advocate for the free carrying of weapons as a solution to combat violence. Yet, empirical evidence proves otherwise. Countries like Colombia, which implemented strict gun control measures, have seen a significant reduction in violence. On the other hand, the United States, with its high number of firearms in civilian hands, continues to struggle with high rates of violent crime. Argentina, with a relatively low number of firearms per capita, emphasizes the importance of strict gun control laws. Disarmament programs have also yielded positive results in reducing violence. The evidence is clear: more weapons in civilian hands do not equate to more security. What society truly demands is increased security, not more weapons.

Crime and Violence in Latin America

Crime and violence continue to be pressing issues in Latin America, affecting the safety and well-being of its population. With 9% of the world’s population, the region bears the burden of 35% of the world’s homicides. This alarming statistic highlights the urgent need for effective measures to address this pervasive problem.

High Homicide Rate in Latin America

Latin America grapples with a disproportionately high homicide rate compared to other regions. While Argentina’s homicide rate is relatively lower than some of its neighboring countries, it still faces significant challenges. International organizations such as the UN and the OAS have conducted research indicating that Argentina’s homicide rate is among the lowest in Latin America. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that the country’s robbery rate is twice the regional average, underscoring the need for comprehensive strategies to combat crime.

Insecurity as a Social Demand in Argentina

Insecurity has emerged as one of the primary social demands in Argentina, as evidenced by various surveys conducted over the years. The population’s concerns about safety and personal security have become increasingly prominent. While Argentina’s homicide rate may be comparatively lower, the prevalence of robberies and other forms of crime remains a significant cause for concern. It is imperative for policymakers to address these concerns and prioritize the safety and well-being of the citizens.

The Myth of Free Carrying of Weapons

There is a prevailing myth that the free carrying of weapons can effectively combat violence and reduce the number of homicides. However, a closer examination of the evidence reveals that this belief is unfounded and misguided. It is crucial to dispel this myth and focus on evidence-based approaches to address the complex issue of violence.

No Reduction in Homicides with Free Carrying of Weapons

Contrary to popular belief, allowing the free carrying of weapons does not lead to a decrease in the number of homicides. In fact, empirical evidence consistently shows that there is a proportional relationship between the number of weapons in civil society and the number of deaths, whether they are homicides, suicides, femicides, or accidents. This means that increasing the availability of firearms does not make society safer, but rather exacerbates the problem of violence.

Success of Gun Control Measures in Colombia and Other Countries

Colombia serves as a compelling example of how gun control measures can effectively reduce levels of violence. During its most violent era, when Medellín was notorious as the world capital of crime, the country had a staggering homicide rate. However, through the implementation of strict gun control policies, Colombia has managed to significantly decrease its homicide rate. This success story is mirrored in countries like Japan, Canada, and South Korea, which have enforced stringent gun control measures and consequently enjoy low rates of violent crime. In contrast, the United States, with its lax gun regulations and high number of firearms in civilian hands, continues to grapple with alarming levels of violence.

Gun Control Measures in Argentina

Argentina has implemented various gun control measures to ensure the safety and security of its citizens. These measures aim to regulate the possession and carrying of firearms, mitigating the risk of violence and promoting a safer society.

National Weapons and Explosives Law

The National Weapons and Explosives Law in Argentina provides a comprehensive framework for the control and regulation of firearms. This law specifies the different categories of firearms that can be used with specific permits, while prohibiting the civilian use of automatic weapons. The National Agency for Controlled Materials (ANMAC) plays a crucial role in enforcing compliance with this law, ensuring that firearms are used responsibly and legally.

Disarmament Programs as Violence Prevention

Argentina has also implemented disarmament programs as a proactive approach to violence prevention. The National Program for Voluntary Surrender of Firearms and Ammunition allows individuals to anonymously and voluntarily surrender their firearms and ammunition in exchange for an economic stimulus. This program has been successful in taking a significant number of firearms out of circulation, contributing to a safer environment for all.

Weapons in the Hands of Institutions, Not Civilians

Argentina recognizes the importance of ensuring that weapons are in the hands of institutions that possess the legitimacy, legality, and suitability to have and use them. The proliferation of firearms among civilians is not the solution to enhancing security. Instead, the focus should be on empowering law enforcement agencies and other authorized institutions to maintain public safety and protect the well-being of the population.


After examining the evidence and considering the various gun control measures in place, it becomes clear that the belief that more weapons in civilian hands lead to increased security is a fallacy. In fact, the data consistently shows that the proliferation of firearms among civilians does not result in a safer society. Instead, it poses a greater risk and contributes to higher levels of violence.

More Weapons in Civilian Hands Does Not Mean More Security

The empirical evidence strongly refutes the notion that an armed society is a safer society. Studies have consistently shown that countries with stricter gun control measures and fewer firearms in civilian hands tend to have lower rates of violent crime. The proportional relationship between the number of weapons in civil society and the number of deaths further emphasizes the need to prioritize effective gun control measures over the misguided belief in the free carrying of weapons.

Society Demands Security, Not More Weapons

What society truly demands is not an increase in the number of weapons, but rather enhanced security and safety for its citizens. It is imperative for policymakers to listen to these demands and focus on implementing comprehensive strategies that address the root causes of violence. This includes strengthening gun control measures, investing in crime prevention programs, and promoting social cohesion and economic opportunities for all. By prioritizing security over the proliferation of weapons, we can work towards creating a safer and more peaceful society for everyone.

In conclusion, Latin America faces a significant issue with crime and violence, with Argentina being no exception. While Argentina’s homicide rate may be relatively low compared to other countries in the region, its high robbery rate is cause for concern. The idea that allowing civilians to carry weapons will reduce violence is a false notion, as empirical evidence shows that more weapons in society lead to more deaths. Countries like Colombia, Japan, Canada, and South Korea have implemented strict gun control measures and have seen a decrease in violent crime. Argentina also has regulations in place regarding firearms, with the National Weapons and Explosives Law and the National Agency for Controlled Materials ensuring compliance. Disarmament programs have proven to be effective in Argentina, with over 200 thousand firearms being taken out of circulation. The notion that an armed society is a safer society is debunked by the data, as more weapons in civilian hands do not equate to increased security. What society truly needs is not more weapons, but more security.

Related Articles

Back to top button